UPDATE: Disney has issued a statement regarding the death of Dr. Kanokporn, stating the restaurant in which she suffered an allergic reaction is neither owned nor operated by Disney.
A spokesperson for the company said: “We are deeply saddened by the family’s loss and understand their grief. Given that this restaurant is neither owned nor operated by Disney, we are merely defending ourselves against the plaintiff’s attorney’s attempt to include us in their lawsuit against the restaurant.”
ORIGINAL STORY:
Disney is seeking to dismiss a wrongful death claim because the accuser signed up to a one month trial of Disney+ in 2019.
Jeffrey Piccolo is suing the entertainment giant over the death of his wife, Dr. Kanokporn Tangsuan, after alleging that she suffered an allergic reaction while dining at a resort restaurant in Disney Springs at the Walt Disney World Resort in Florida.
According to court filings, Piccolo claims that he and his wife “were assured that her order would be allergen free” by a waiter at the restaurant. The couple stressed before dining that Tangsuan had a nut and dairy allergy.
Shortly after eating, however, Piccolo claims that his wife suffered a “severe acute allergic reaction”, and died later that day on October 5. The medical examiner’s investigation “determined that her cause of death was anaphylaxis due to elevated levels of dairy and nut in her system”, the lawsuit against Walt Disney Parks and Resorts states.
Piccolo is arguing the restaurant staff were negligent, and is suing Disney for damages exceeding $50,000 (£38,900), per the complaint.
As per a court filing (via The Guardian), Disney has argued that the case ought to be dismissed and settled out of court because Piccolo agreed to the company’s terms of use – which state that users agree to settle any disputes with the company out of court via arbitration – when he signed up for a one-month free trial of Disney+ in 2019, and again in 2023, when he purchased the Disney+ theme park tickets using his Disney account.
Attorneys for Disney claim that the Disney+ terms state: “When you create a Disney+ or ESPN+ account, you also agree to the Walt Disney Company’s Terms of Use,” which “govern your use of other Disney Services”. The services include “sites, software, applications, content, product and services”, which include the Disney Parks and Resorts website, they say.
Disney has argued that the terms of use include an arbitration clause that applies to “all disputes” including those involving “The Walt Disney Company or its affiliates” and that Walt Disney Parks and Resorts is an affiliate of the Walt Disney Company.
In August, Piccolo’s lawyers responded to Disney’s claims in a filing, saying the company’s argument “borders on the surreal”.
His lawyers argued that the company’s position “is based on the incredible argument that any person who signs up for a Disney+ account, even free trials that are not extended beyond the trial period, will have forever waived the right to a jury trial enjoyed by them and any future Estate to which they are associated, and will instead have agreed to arbitrate any and all disputes against any and all Disney entities and affiliates, no matter how far removed from use of the Disney+ streaming service, including personal injury and wrongful death claims”.
His lawyers have also argued that Piccolo agreed to the terms on behalf of himself, and not on behalf of his wife, or her estate, when he clicked ‘“agree and continue” on the Disney+ registration page.
A hearing has been scheduled for October 2, 2024.
Daniel Zuniga, a partner at Personal Injury of Florida law firm, who specialises in wrongful death and personal injury lawsuits and is not involved in the proceedings, told the Guardian yesterday (August 14) that Disney’s argument appeared to be a “big legal stretch” and that in his many years of practice, he had never seen an argument like it.
“If someone’s doing a free trial for Disney+, I don’t think it’s rational or reasonable to believe that the average person will believe they’re signing away any type of rights that deal with a theme park,” Zuniga said.
“The consequences of such a ruling or such a holding could be catastrophic for the average person,” he added, because “big conglomerates just keep getting bigger and bigger, so how far up the chain can it go?”
Zuniga said that he would be “terrified for the average consumer” if the court rules in Disney’s favour, and that he hopes “rational minds will prevail”. He added: “It really is unconscionable.”
Earlier this month, Disney+ revealed plans to increase their subscription prices once again. From October 17, 2024, the cheapest tier, Disney+ Basic (with advertisements), will increase to $9.99 per month (£7.85) up from $7.99 per month (£6.28).
Premium will also increase to $15.99 per month (£12.57) from $13.99 per month (£11.00). The price hikes come just one year after the last subscription fee increase.