An engagement ring is one of the most personal pieces of jewelry one will ever own. Beyond the sentiment, an engagement ring will also probably be one of the biggest pieces of investment jewelry you’ll acquire. While there is certainly a lot that goes into choosing the engagement ring that is right for you, we want to make one thing clear: You don’t have to spend more than your means to get a ring that looks elevated and, well, expensive. 

I spoke to some of the most talented jewelers in the industry, and they educated me on a list of qualities that, no matter the price, carat size, or cut, will make a ring look cheap. From what to pay attention to that you might have otherwise overlooked to remembering to stay true to your personal style, the fine jewelers ahead are here to fill you in on all the ways to make your engagement ring look as expensive as possible, no matter what your budget is. 

“Diamonds are graded on four criteria: cut, color, carat, and clarity. You can get by with all sorts of combinations of the above, but I like to avoid diamonds that have a super-low color grade. Diamonds that are K, L, and M tend to really show a yellow hint and not quite look like that bright, white diamond you’ve always thought of.” — Octavia Zamagias, Octavia Elizabeth Jewelry 

How to avoid the above: 

“You might be able to go up in carat weight, but rather than getting a larger stone in this color range, I suggest sizing down for a whiter diamond that will really look more expensive overall.” — Zamagias

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698187023535

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110025452

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110084136

“Prongs that are too wide or heavy can distract from a gorgeous center diamond and cheapen the look of an engagement ring.” — Ashley Zhang, Ashley Zhang Jewelry

“Whether you are working with a quarter of a carat or five carats, be sure your stone is set by an expert. Imperfect settings that look like an arts and crafts project are not what you want in a long-term investment like an engagement ring.” — Zamagias

How to avoid the above: 

See also  The Best Dressed Lasgidi Style Stars

“I prefer to use sharp claw prongs because they look more delicate but are strong enough to hold the diamond in place over time.” — Zhang

“Details like well-shaped and balanced prongs or claw prongs make all the difference in the final appearance of your ring. Even if your stone is not top-notch in quality or huge in carat weight, if it is set well, it will look and feel far more expensive.” — Zamagias 

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698187233269

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698187327149

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110285882

“There’s nothing that screams cheap more than bad metalwork.” — Corina Madilian, Single Stone

How to avoid the above:

“Make sure the design of your ring is well-executed and not a bad knockoff of something else.” — Madilian

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567178705974

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1612996602767

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698187551647
Price upon request.

“If you are considering a diamond halo to complement your center stone, be sure the small stones, or melee, are relatively a match in color. Having a huge contrast in the color qualities will be a notable difference that confuses the eye—and not in a good way!” — Zamagias

How to avoid the above:

“Matching your center stone to the diamond melee in the halo will actually make the center stone appear larger, which is usually the goal of a diamond halo in the first place.” — Zamagias

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110093481

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1612495266694

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110620065

“Diamonds that are set too high can make an engagement ring look cheap. Many times, this is due to going to a jeweler who is using a mass-produced setting that is made to fit a variety of diamond sizes. There will be too much space under the culet (the pointy part of the diamond).” — Zhang

How to avoid the above:

“We always make our settings from scratch based on the measurements of the diamond. This ensures a setting that is lower to the finger and more comfortable for everyday wear.” — Zhang

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110404376
Pricing upon request.

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567111092841

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698188005172

“Choose a style that works with you and your lifestyle. It doesn’t make sense to have the It ring if it doesn’t work for YOU.” — Madilian

How to avoid the above:

See also  ‘Elden Ring’ streamer Perrikaryal is beating the DLC with just her mind

“Choose an engagement ring that reflects your style as a couple and your shared aesthetic. Don’t be afraid of picking the ‘wrong’ ring nor get caught up in a specific trend. It is best to stick to a classic if you don’t know what else to choose. You can always personalize your ring with bands to create something special, just for you.” — Madilian

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567179625056

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1698188141789

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567179859867

“This one may come as a surprise, but maybe you’ve got your dream ring, and it is just slightly too big or too small. Don’t skimp on the resizing fee. I have seen people take beautiful rings to a stall in DTLA to get it resized because it is only $25 and only an hour wait. What you often end up with is a shank that is obviously cut and manipulated. Sure, it looks okay top-down, but flip that ring around and you see a solder line or mismatched seam. It’s not pretty and instantly cheapens the ring overall.” — Zamagias

“If you need your ring resized, take it or ship it to the jeweler you who made the ring. It might be more expensive overall and take a few weeks, but you’ve come this far! The seam should be undetectable.” — Zamagias

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110784490

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567110349072

cheap looking engagement rings 282185 1567111072556
This post was originally published on an earlier date and has since been updated. 

Source link